CHEERSNetworkClimate & health research
Study protocol and cohort methodsSelected wider researchFull text reviewed

Design and measurement in a study of war exposure, health, and aging: protocol for the Vietnam health and aging study

Korinek et al. · 2019 · BMC Public Health

DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7680-6 ↗

01 / Study designStudy protocol
02 / ContributionPlanned methods and outcomes
03 / Interpretation

A protocol does not establish intervention effects.

Read the limitations ↓

Summary

Summary

Documents Vietnam Health and Aging Study design, completed baseline fieldwork and biomarker collection for investigating long-term relationships between war exposure and later-life health.

Full text reviewed

The summary describes the published study and the sources listed below.

Scientific notes: 2026-11-12 · Research connections: 12 November 2026

Protocol / published information

Protocol overview

Reports baseline implementation, not estimated causal war effects: response was 84.7%; 2,342 participants agreed to biomarkers, and 2,325 had at least one valid body/function measure.

Study design & setting

Study design and methods

Population, setting or evidence base

2,447 community-dwelling adults born in 1959 or earlier, surveyed May–August 2018. Twelve communes/wards were sampled across Ba Vi, Yen Khanh, Bo Trach and Dong Hoi, Vietnam.

Methods

Four districts were purposively chosen by wartime bombing intensity; residents were sampled within sex and veteran-status strata. Home interviews linked life histories and health with clinic-based functional, anthropometric and biological measures. Follow-up was planned for 2021.

Limits to interpretation

Limitations

Selective survival, long-term recall and geographic selection limit inference. Heat/humidity and interview fatigue affected fieldwork. Unexpectedly high HbA1c and poor agreement with another assay require caution. Baseline documentation does not establish completed follow-up.

Research relevance

Research relevance

A concrete example of linking social histories and physiological observations under field constraints. Ba Vi is a sampled district; the paper does not identify the sample as FilaBavi HDSS or a CHEERS implementation.

People, places & projects

Research connections

Labels identify published coauthors, study settings, planned protocol settings and wider methods or network connections.

Coauthors with research profiles

Sites & research settings

Projects & methods connections

Published sources & review scope

Sources

This page summarises the publication. Sources and editorial scope ↗

Back to publications ↗Meet the researchers ↗